Oct 072005
 

This story is disappointing. I dig Southwest. I fly their airline. I watch their reality show on A&E and generally sympathize with them when they have to deal with some real whackos. However, they seem to have a real problem with consistently enforcing their policies. Their Contract Of Carriage clearly states under the first reason for Refusal of Travel that they’ll boot you if you’re wearing offensive clothing. That’s fine. What isn’t fine is that they’ll let you get on a plane, get you part of the way to your destination, and then enforce a policy that could result in you being booted. They did the same thing to me on a trip to NY. We flew with my son, who, at the time, was a year old. Since he was under two, he was a lap child and could fly for free. Since he had just turned a year old, we didn’t bring his birth certificate and we were not challenged on the flight to Islip. On our return trip, I got into a heated debate with the check-in agent because I didn’t have proof of age. Eventually, she capitulated, but she initially intended to charge us full fare for his return trip because we couldn’t prove that a child who was clearly not two and who had flown without incident several days before was, in fact, under two.

 Posted by on October 7, 2005 at 4:30 am
Oct 042005
 

I always dig the reports that NPR Legal Affairs correspondent, Nina Totenberg, turns in for NPR’s Morning Edition. (Stepan recently pointed out that her last name means “dead mountain” in German. How cool is that?) I just love the explanations of rulings when the Supreme Court adjourns in the summer and the profiles when it returns on the first Monday in October. We’ve been hearing a lot from her with two Supreme Court nominations in the last six months. I particularly liked her piece this past Friday on Justice Breyer. It gave great insight into his viewpoints and how he arrives at a decision. It was really informative and added something to my understanding of how the Supreme Court operates. On the face of the story, I’d have to say he’s now my favorite justice. I’ll be paying particular attention to his opinions over the next Supreme Court session, especially now that we’ll have two new viewpoints to gauge.

 Posted by on October 4, 2005 at 2:25 am
Sep 162005
 

Enjoy your last free Paul Krugman op-ed. After this one, rumor has it that he and the other NY Times op-ed mavens will be hidden behind the lock and key of subscriptions. CNN.com saw the error of their ways and restored free access to video after trying to get people to pay for it. Here’s to hoping that the NY Times as the same revelation. I know the special seekret way to see archives of the Statesman via my public library account. I wonder if that’s the way around this too? Stay tuned…

Update: Sure enough, I can still get my Krugman fix via the Austin Public Library Reference Databases – Newspapers & Current Events page. From there, I just hit the Remote Access link for InfoTrac, entered my library card number and then searched for Krugman in articles dated since Aug. 31. I was presented with his latest editorial, “The Way It Is” at the top of the list. Hooray for Austin Public Library and TexShare.

 Posted by on September 16, 2005 at 4:46 pm
Sep 022005
 

It sounds like things are improving somewhat today, but this week and the events unfolding in New Orleans are just incomprehensible. I watched two things this morning on CNN.com that everyone should see and since they prudently decided to start allowing free video again, it’s possible. Two disclaimers are that you need Windows Media Player and that these are only good for a week from posting date.

  • New Orleans Mayor Nagin gives an interview unlike any other I’ve ever heard from a public official. You can read the transcript, but it’s more effective if you listen to him
  • We keep hearing about the people at the convention center and the Superdome, but who knows how many people are in this situation?

And, as usual, Rude Pundit tells it like it is. He shows us that Mr. Bill is smarter than Shrub and proposes a constitutional amendment that I can get behind.

Update with more stuff:

The BBC has some good before and after aerial shots.

This is an interesting take on the poor response of the federal government. I give it marks for originality anyway.

 Posted by on September 2, 2005 at 7:56 pm
Aug 182005
 

I ran across this yesterday on dKos and decided it needed replicating here. What follows are quotes from the time when Clinton committed troops to Bosnia.

“You can support the troops but not the president.”
–Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)

“Well, I just think it’s a bad idea. What’s going to happen is they’re going to be over there for 10, 15, maybe 20 years.”
–Joe Scarborough (R-FL)

“Explain to the mothers and fathers of American servicemen that may come home in body bags why their son or daughter have to give up their life?”
–Sean Hannity, Fox News, 4/6/99

“[The] President . . . is once again releasing American military might on a foreign country with an ill-defined objective and no exit strategy. He has yet to tell the Congress how much this operation will cost. And he has not informed our nation’s armed forces about how long they will be away from home. These strikes do not make for a sound foreign policy.”
–Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA)

“American foreign policy is now one huge big mystery. Simply put, the administration is trying to lead the world with a feel-good foreign policy.”

–Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)

“If we are going to commit American troops, we must be certain they have a clear mission, an achievable goal and an exit strategy.”
–Karen Hughes, speaking on behalf of George W Bush

“I had doubts about the bombing campaign from the beginning . . I didn’t think we had done enough in the diplomatic area.”
–Senator Trent Lott (R-MS)

“I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just learning that lesson right now. The President began this mission with very vague objectives and lots of unanswered questions. A month later, these questions are still unanswered. There are no clarified rules of engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our over-extended military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President started this thing, and there still is no plan today”
–Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)

“Victory means exit strategy, and it’s important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is.”
–Governor George W. Bush (R-TX)

 Posted by on August 18, 2005 at 3:34 pm
Jul 202005
 

All kinds of uproar over John Roberts as Bush’s nominee to replace O’Connor. I just ran across a couple of AP photos showing Roberts’s family during last night’s press conference. It looks like John Jr. was having an Andrew Giuliani moment. Get down! Anyway, who are these people that they dress their kids like that in this day and age. I mean, I realize being nominated to the Supreme Court is a big deal, but saddle shoes??!??!

 Posted by on July 20, 2005 at 5:19 pm
Jul 142005
 

I hadn’t checked in with GYWO since before the London bombings a week ago. I just did and saw this. The Daily Show also showed a clip this week of John Gibson on Faux News in an op-ed called My Word talking about how he was disappointed that Paris didn’t get the 2012 olympics so that they could worry about bombers for a while. Wow.

Update: It’s gone now, but it was a page quoting Brit Hume from Fox News mentioning something to the effect that he wished he’d called his stockbroker the morning of the London bombings and cashed in on the resulting market fluctuations. The quote was contrasted with photos of those killed and injured by the bombings.

 Posted by on July 14, 2005 at 4:49 pm